The learned ravel judge ruled that the case was not one in which it was tolerate to look for a duty of care strain in terms of the principles enunciated by Lord Atkin in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 at 580 In coming to that conclusion, his Honour relied in general on the decision of the House of Lords in London Graving dockage Co Ltd v Horton [1951] AC 737. He therefore enjoin himself in accordance with the classic exposition of the invitors duty to his invitee as laid down by Willes J in Indermaur v Dames (1866) LR 1 CP 274 at 288, namely, that it was the appella nts obligation to take probable care to pre! vent damage from unusual danger of which it knew or ought to own known. The trial judge, while recognising that the moisture on the floor did crap some kind of hazard to customers, held that it was no much than customers obtain on a wet morning would unremarkably expect. It was not an unusual danger. However,...If you want to get a generous essay, hostelry it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.